Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit against Google LLC concluded with a win for Epic, the creator of the popular game Fortnite. This victory could usher in open competition in the digital download marketplace, potentially leading to lower prices for consumers. Developers eager to expand their customer base may now offer more choices in payment processing and innovate to maintain a competitive advantage.
The lawsuit centers around Google’s in-app transaction fees. Previously, in-app transaction fees were inflated by up to 30%, significantly higher than the 3% seen in other markets. Because over 95% of Android apps are distributed through the Google Play Store, introducing alternative download and purchase methods is vital for the next wave of developers aiming to reach consumers at more affordable prices.
In response to the allegation of app store misconduct, Google stated that the fees are integral to Google’s investment in the app store and to Android’s success.
In a matter of three hours, the jury’s verdict favored Epic Games: Google would lower its commission costs to developers. The specifics of the solution are underway.
Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, wrote, “After four weeks of detailed court testimony, the California jury found against the Google Play monopoly on all counts,” in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter.
When asked if tech monopolies- like the one Google was accused of forming- are inevitable, Miles Cooper, a student at Santa Fe College and Gainesville native said, “I think a 100% monopoly is not possible but tech companies have an enormous chunk of the market already – monopolies are never a good thing because of the resulting lack of competition within marketplaces.”
Even though Epic’s victory came as a surprise to many, one factor that may have resulted in the victory is how the company makes profits from Fortnite. Fortnite is free to download, meaning it depends on money from in-game purchases to fund the continuance of the game. Once Google’s high app store costs jeopardized Epic’s financial stability, it became a lawsuit of business success and not simply advantageous app store ethics.
Another factor that may have aided Epic’s argument is the discovery of Google’s destruction of evidence. Judge Donato said he “never [saw] anything so egregious [that also] undercuts due process,” after learning Google deleted evidence it was ordered to preserve for the case. Destruction of evidence and Google’s purposeful evasion of anti-trust regulations soon became integral to Epic’s argument against the popular search engine.
Judge James Donato ruled that Google’s app store’s protective barriers to competition harm the development of smartphone technology, software developers, and fair market practices. He also clarified the hindrance imposed on developers as Google seeks higher profits while the developers seek to improve existing technology.
Jane Williams, a business entrepreneur who started many successful businesses says, “What constitutes a “fair market” is an opinion; and the person or group forming the rules of fairness has the advantage,”
In a press release to the general public, Epic Games stated, “[This] verdict is a win for all app developers and consumers around the world. It proves that Google’s app store practices are illegal and they abuse their monopoly to extract exorbitant fees, stifle competition, and reduce innovation.”
While many would say the outcome of this lawsuit is a victory, Williams points out that “The added oversight from the government in antitrust cases often comes with added rules, and added rules can make it more challenging for a smaller business to have equal access to markets.”
Although this lawsuit marks a new phase in technology, uncertainty still looms in the industry. Google plans to appeal the decision.
Check out other recent articles from the Florida Political Review here.
